If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the
FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to
register or
login before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
| 15 OCT 2002 at 2:57am |
dabomb765Space Cadet
Posts : 122
Joined: 13 OCT 2002
Status : Online | Maybe it didnt work out for the xbox. I dont know. However overall I dont think they are big fans of the genre, they gave syberia a 7.1. I never played syberia but I think I can safely say that it deserverd a higher grade. Also they gave sanitarium a 7.0, amerzone a 5.5, and faust a 3.5.
|
| 15 OCT 2002 at 6:39am |
CerberusPrivate Detective
Posts : 417
Joined: 10 OCT 2002
Status : Online | Hmm...the article won't open for me.
I wouldn't worry though, the market for adventure games was non-existent on the X-box anyway (the company will have already made a great deal of money from the PC and Mac versions - if there is a Mac version, I forget).
|
| 15 OCT 2002 at 1:28pm |
JonasKyratzesSorcerer Apprentice
Posts : 280
Joined: 10 OCT 2002
Status : Online | They just don't like adventure games.
[i]
|
| 15 OCT 2002 at 5:29pm |
nytimesguyPrivate Detective
Posts : 684
Joined: 14 OCT 2002
Status : Online | how can you safely say Siberia deserved more than a 7 if you haven't played it? Personally I wouldn't have rated it that high.
Charles - Game Theorist
|
| 15 OCT 2002 at 6:03pm |
dabomb765Space Cadet
Posts : 122
Joined: 13 OCT 2002
Status : Online | can safely say it deserved higher than a 7.1 based on all other reviews and other peoples opinion. I could be wrong.
|
