| Just Adventure News : |
| Home - Forum Home |
| Page 1 |
| 1 MAR 2003 at 10:05pm | |
dimidimidimiSchattenjger![]() Posts : 1784 Joined: 10 OCT 2002 Status : Online | Was this monk a Christian monk? Because if he was I doubt it that he run out of paper...more probably he torn them apart in purpose. I was studying about the ancient Greek and the Viking mythology about a year ago in one cultural course I was taking, and I found out great crimes that the church had comitted to both these mythologies. Great temples were burnt down, ancient scripts torn, and all the old gods were named demons by priests. They even connected geometrical shapes (like the pentagram or pentalpha) with satan for crying out loud. They brought science many years back... But you don't want me to extend on the subject because it could take lots of time.... I was actually a christian some years ago, but after studying a little bit more of history I understood my mistake and now I am an atheist. Maybe there is a higher being but I do not believe in jesus being divine and all this hocus-pocus. PDF adventure magazine - The Inventory&&http://www.justadventure.com/TheInventory/TheInventory.shtm&&&&What would you give to know the truth?&&http://www.brokensaints.com |
| Profile Search | |
| 1 MAR 2003 at 10:31pm | |
MichalNGrand Inquisitor![]() ![]() Posts : 7058 Joined: 14 SEP 2003 Status : Online | Originally Posted By dimidimidimi (1 MAR 2003 10:05pm) I'm quite certain he didn't run out of paper. Because they were writing on vellum And it was common practice to reuse old books as writing material. Since the monk most likely didn't speak Greek, I don't see why he would dismantle the book "on purpose". It was simply Greek to him I was studying about the ancient Greek and the Viking mythology about a year ago in one cultural course I was taking, and I found out great crimes that the church had comitted to both these mythologies. Kinda makes ya wonder... how did Vikings or Greeks treat other mythologies? Were they all nice and tolerant? But you don't want me to extend on the subject because it could take lots of time.... I was actually a christian some years ago, but after studying a little bit more of history I understood my mistake and now I am an atheist. Maybe there is a higher being but I do not believe in jesus being divine and all this hocus-pocus. Ah. I knew you could make a good commie If you studied history like you said, you must have noticed that atheists committed just as many crimes as Christians. And they were not above destroying Christian churches and books. You have to realize that atheism is as much religion as any other; you can only believe that there is no God, but there is no proof. And most religions are not too friendly to competition... I forgot my sig. |
| Profile Search | |
| 1 MAR 2003 at 10:39pm | |
MichalNGrand Inquisitor![]() ![]() Posts : 7058 Joined: 14 SEP 2003 Status : Online | Originally Posted By Petter_Holmberg (1 MAR 2003 9:55pm) I think not. This is kinda like the RIAA crying that every song copied is lost profit. There is no guarantee that had the knowledge been available, it would have been used. Calculus is something to be discovered, not invented. It exists regardless of whether we know about it. I tend to believe that inventions and discoveries are made when they are needed and when the world is ready for them. Consider the fact that when a great invention was made, there were usually several other people, often in other countries, who were working something similar independently. And many inventions had been made "prematurely" and then forgotten for a long time. If someone invented the transistor in 1850, it would not have precipitated the era of electronic computers. No one would know how to mass produce it, let alone use it. Likewise if differential equations were known in the Middle Ages, what would people do with them? And how would they solve massive equations without computers? It's all like a giant jigsaw... you can't just rip out a single piece. It doesn't make any sense without all the neighboring pieces. I forgot my sig. |
| Profile Search | |
| 1 MAR 2003 at 11:07pm | |
dimidimidimiSchattenjger![]() Posts : 1784 Joined: 10 OCT 2002 Status : Online | Originally Posted By MichalN (1 MAR 2003 10:31pm) And there you have it, MichalN not only knows everything about all the religions on the world, but he also know what language this monk was speaking. Since you are the historian here maybe you also know that Greek and Latin used to be in the ancient world what English and Spanish is today for the first and for the second if he was in Greece where he probably was to acquire the certain book I am quite certain that he spoke the language. And how did he happen to come across the book by the way? Did Pythagoras gave it to him for xmas maybe? Huuhhh...atheism a religion. Do you know that a religion needs a dogma? Atheism has no dogma. You don't believe in anything. So you can play with the verb if you want and say that you believe in nothing, but still makes no difference, atheists have no religion, they have no gods, no dogma and no rules made by a higher being to follow. How did Greeks and Vikings treat other mythologies? I don't know...why don't you tell me, since you know everything. I also like you certainty of the extent of crimes that atheists have commited and that it is the same with the ones the christians have done You are really funny, if you knew what you were talking about I might even had taken you seriously... but since I know it's just plain old Michal 'if people say black I say white to be able to sleep tonight' I'm not I'm sorry. Btw the problem is not only with the Christian religion. All religions are methods to control people...because muslims would not take a plane and throw it on WTC and American soldiers would not throw bombs on Afghanistan to kill people they don't even know for Bush and for Bin Ladin but they would do it for god and for allah... PDF adventure magazine - The Inventory&&http://www.justadventure.com/TheInventory/TheInventory.shtm&&&&What would you give to know the truth?&&http://www.brokensaints.com |
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 12:05am | |
MichalNGrand Inquisitor![]() ![]() Posts : 7058 Joined: 14 SEP 2003 Status : Online | Originally Posted By dimidimidimi (1 MAR 2003 11:06pm) I'm not sure where the monk worked (Petter?) but I wouldn't be surprised if it was Italy or France or Germany (or whatever they were called back then). Latin was obviously very important (and still is) in the Catholic Church. Greek was important for scholars but the actual scribes were not scholars. Even if the monk understood Greek, more likely than not he would not understand what the book said anyway. Or do you understand highly advanced material pertaining to any field? I don't! And how did he happen to come across the book by the way? Did Pythagoras gave it to him for xmas maybe? Not very likely. I would imagine that the book was not an original but rather a copy at any rate. And books did tend to end up in the strangest places. Huuhhh...atheism a religion. Do you know that a religion needs a dogma? Atheism has no dogma. Oh yes it does. The dogma is "There is no God". And just like religious dogmas, it is a dogma because it is unprovable. You have to take it on faith. How did Greeks and Vikings treat other mythologies? I don't know...why don't you tell me, since you know everything. No, I don't know this. I just thought that since you were complaining about how Christians were picking on Vikings, you knew for a fact that Vikings did nothing of the sort. I also like you certainty of the extent of crimes that atheists have commited and that it is the same with the ones the christians have done You are really funny, if you knew what you were talking about I might even had taken you seriously... You sure you aren't talking to a mirror? Btw the problem is not only with the Christian religion. All religions are methods to control people... Really. Well the commies said that's what religions were, that's true... because muslims would not take a plane and throw it on WTC and American soldiers would not throw bombs on Afghanistan to kill people they don't even know for Bush and for Bin Ladin but they would do it for god and for allah... You surprise me! Or maybe not... but I think your view of religions is a little too simplified. Do you really think every American is a conservative Christian? And every muslim a religious fanatic? So tell me, when there was - for instance - Civil War in the US, that was for God too? Even though both sides believed in the exact same God, were members of the same Church(es) and their differences were political and economic? I forgot my sig. |
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 12:20am | |
JoGuild Master![]() ![]() Posts : 3313 Joined: 3 NOV 2002 Location: AU, Qld. Status : Offline | Gee wish I'd seen that documentary here Petter. It may have been shown of course. Sounds really interesting (even with Michal & Dimi having a go at each other) |
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 12:42am | |
InlandAZGuild Master![]() ![]() Posts : 5587 Joined: 4 MAY 2007 Status : Offline | Originally Posted By narji (2 MAR 2003 12:20am) Never, never a dull moment here - What? |
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 12:46am | |
dimidimidimiSchattenjger![]() Posts : 1784 Joined: 10 OCT 2002 Status : Online | Originally Posted By MichalN (2 MAR 2003 12:05am) 1. If it was a copy how come we didn't find the original before? 2. Dogma is a belief, and atheism has no belief, you do not believe in anything. Do you know what the word believe means? Christians often say I believe without finishing the sentence... 3. Ahhh... I didn't say Christians were picking on Vikings. I said that Christians forced their religion on the Vikings. Vikings maybe plundered other civilizations but they did it for money. Christians went to Scandinavia (and not only Scandinavia) and they made the old religion illegal and anything that was connected to the old religion became also illegal. Should I remind you maybe that the Olympic games were cancelled by King Theodosius a christian king because they were considered pagan? Or should I mention that 3 out of the 7 wonders of the world of the ancient times were destroyed by Christian hands? The examples are hundreds of crimes that the Christian church has committed... let's not even go to the crusades or to the inquisition. "Ancient people took for granted that religion was indissolubly linked to a particular city, nation or PEOPLE. Jews identified their religion with the Jewish people as a whole, united by tradition, however dispersed throughout the world. . . The Christian movement, however, encouraged people to ABANDON THEIR ANCESTRAL CUSTOMS and break the sacred bonds of family, society and nation." (The Origin . . . by Elaine Pagels pg.114) Religion is intertwined with culture, so if you want to destroy one's religion you have to destroy the culture first. So I'll let you guess by yourself what did Christianity do. When Alexander the great and his men reached Mesopotamia they did not destroy the hanging gardens of Babylon because they were of another religion, but instead they spoke with awe about it and they considered themselves lucky to have seen such a sight. I could even talk to you about how the testament is a racist book and how it calls Greek people dogs in one part. I could talk for hours about the subject but really I doubt it you will agree with anything because you simply never do.... 4. Did I say that all those who believe in a religion are fanatics? Or did I say that all wars happen for religions? No I didn't. But most wars throught the history had religion as a reason or as a background... WWI, WWII, Greeks vs Persians, Crusades, War in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia etc, etc, etc.... I could go on forever. PDF adventure magazine - The Inventory&&http://www.justadventure.com/TheInventory/TheInventory.shtm&&&&What would you give to know the truth?&&http://www.brokensaints.com |
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 12:55am | |
InlandAZGuild Master![]() ![]() Posts : 5587 Joined: 4 MAY 2007 Status : Offline | Dogma is a belief, and atheism has no belief Now that's an interesting concept Dimitri - The belief that God does not exist, is exempt from being defined as a belief... What? |
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 1:01am | |
sennebecGuild Master![]() ![]() Posts : 3334 Joined: 15 NOV 2004 Location: US, maine Status : Offline | Originally Posted By InlandAZ (2 MAR 2003 12:55am) that's just what i was thinking, inland... still gaming...
|
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 1:12am | |
dimidimidimiSchattenjger![]() Posts : 1784 Joined: 10 OCT 2002 Status : Online | I think there are a lot of misunderstanding coming out of use of Greek words (dogma, atheism) in the English vocabulary. If you ask atheists what do they believe in, most of them will answer 'I don't believe in anything' and not 'I believe there is no god'. If you read my first post I said that there might be a higher being, so I don't exclude any chance but I don't believe in anything. I just have no dogma... Confused ? PDF adventure magazine - The Inventory&&http://www.justadventure.com/TheInventory/TheInventory.shtm&&&&What would you give to know the truth?&&http://www.brokensaints.com |
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 1:18am | |
InlandAZGuild Master![]() ![]() Posts : 5587 Joined: 4 MAY 2007 Status : Offline | Originally Posted By dimidimidimi (2 MAR 2003 1:12am) Nope not me - I'm just giving you a hard time - Your definition sounds more like that of an agnostic, rather that an atheist. What? |
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 1:24am | |
dimidimidimiSchattenjger![]() Posts : 1784 Joined: 10 OCT 2002 Status : Online | I stand corrected...and not only that but I have to congratulate you for your vocabulary skills... it's just that I didn't know this word existed in English as well, and I thought that agnostics fell also in the atheist category when speaking in English... PDF adventure magazine - The Inventory&&http://www.justadventure.com/TheInventory/TheInventory.shtm&&&&What would you give to know the truth?&&http://www.brokensaints.com |
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 1:24am | |
sennebecGuild Master![]() ![]() Posts : 3334 Joined: 15 NOV 2004 Location: US, maine Status : Offline | ack! you beat me again, inland... "an atheist rejects all religious beliefs and denies the existence of God..." "an agnostic questions the existence of God..." still gaming...
|
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 1:27am | |
dimidimidimiSchattenjger![]() Posts : 1784 Joined: 10 OCT 2002 Status : Online | I question the existence of higher being(s) but I deny the Christian religion and all other religions (including atheism in this case)..... PDF adventure magazine - The Inventory&&http://www.justadventure.com/TheInventory/TheInventory.shtm&&&&What would you give to know the truth?&&http://www.brokensaints.com |
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 1:28am | |
MichalNGrand Inquisitor![]() ![]() Posts : 7058 Joined: 14 SEP 2003 Status : Online | Originally Posted By dimidimidimi (2 MAR 2003 12:45am) Perhaps because it was lost or destroyed? What's so strange about it? Books were routinely copied and libraries regularly burned down... it is AFAIK quite usual that copies of ancient works exist but originals don't. 2. Dogma is a belief, and atheism has no belief, you do not believe in anything. No. Atheists believe there is nothing/no one to believe in. That's a subtle but important difference. Or can you prove that God doesn't exist? If so, I'd love to hear the proof! 3. Christians went to Scandinavia (and not only Scandinavia) and they made the old religion illegal and anything that was connected to the old religion became also illegal. LOL. And that had absolutely nothing to do with money, land and power now did it? Should I remind you maybe that the Olympic games were cancelled by King Theodosius a christian king because they were considered pagan? Should I remind you that some Roman emperors threw Christians to the lions for no better reason than that they were Christian? let's not even go to the crusades or to the inquisition. Why not? There was always money in it. Religion was just the gift wrap. If you think things like crusades or inquisition can't happen without religion, you're almost terminally naive. The Christian movement, however, encouraged people to ABANDON THEIR ANCESTRAL CUSTOMS and break the sacred bonds of family, society and nation." (The Origin . . . by Elaine Pagels pg.114) Most interesting. Which must be why there are so many Christian nations happy to lead wars against each other in the name of their nation? And can you please explain how Christianity breaks the sacred bonds of family? And why it is that the decline of Christianity just so happens to correlate with downfall of traditional family values? Religion is intertwined with culture, so if you want to destroy one's religion you have to destroy the culture first. So I'll let you guess by yourself what did Christianity do. That is not quite true. Christianity readily incorporates elements of local culture. Ever heard of Easter? Or Christmas? That's "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" strategy in practice. I could even talk to you about how the testament is a racist book and how it calls Greek people dogs in one part. All that in a book that basically tells people to be nice to each other... isn't that a paradox? 4. Did I say that all those who believe in a religion are fanatics? Or did I say that all wars happen for religions? You said US bombed Afghanistan in the name of religion... please excuse me if I inferred from this that all wars are religious. I forgot my sig. |
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 1:28am | |
sennebecGuild Master![]() ![]() Posts : 3334 Joined: 15 NOV 2004 Location: US, maine Status : Offline | Originally Posted By dimidimidimi (2 MAR 2003 1:12am) oh yes you do, dimi... dogma..."a positive, arrogant assertion of opinion" still gaming...
|
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 1:37am | |
MichalNGrand Inquisitor![]() ![]() Posts : 7058 Joined: 14 SEP 2003 Status : Online | Originally Posted By dimidimidimi (2 MAR 2003 1:23am) Absolutely not... there's a fundamental difference between atheism and agnosticism. As others have pointed out, to be an atheist you have to believe just as much as adherents of any religion So feel free to ignore what I wrote about atheism above because I composed that before I had a chance to read the other posts. I forgot my sig. |
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 2:02am | |
InlandAZGuild Master![]() ![]() Posts : 5587 Joined: 4 MAY 2007 Status : Offline | In a simpler world, we'd live next door to each other... and the funny part is: We'd still have these little disagreements, and different points of view. What? |
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 5:25am | |
JoGuild Master![]() ![]() Posts : 3313 Joined: 3 NOV 2002 Location: AU, Qld. Status : Offline | I tend to think lots of people misuse the words atheist and agnostic - after all neither are expressions that are used very much in today's society. Don't know how you guys who all have such totally different cultures, languages and backgrounds have really a so much better grasp of the English lanuage than most people with English speaking backgrounds. It says a lot for your upbringing and schooling and not b**** much for ours. I have a Portuguese sister-in-law who speaks about 5 languages - makes me quite ashamed of our school system in Australia and New Zealand. Woops, now I'm totally off the "off-topic" topic. |
| Profile Search | |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 11:38am | |
| Deleted User | First of all, I have to aplologize. It wasn't Pythagoras, and I cannot understand how I made that mistake. I thought about it when I wrote the message, and still I made the mistake! It was Archimedes!!! But the rest is true, and it doesn't change the significance of the discovery. Now, to calm down on the flaming here, I'll better clarify the history behind this document, answering a few of your questions. The italic text below is stolen from a website, to save me some time: The Archimedes Palimpsest, as the book is called, is in terrible shape. (A palimpsest is a manuscript that has been written on more than once; in this case, a 13th-century Greek prayer book overlays the 10th-century script of the treatises.) The pages have been battered, gouged, scorched by fire and blotched by fungus. Without the use of computer technology, they would be mostly unreadable. But when the palimpsest caught the attention of the great Danish philologist Johan Ludvig Heiberg in 1906, the underlying script was much more legible. At that time, the volume was in a library collection in Constantinople - present-day Istanbul - and, until Heiberg went to examine it, nobody seems to have realized its importance; the book contained the ancient Greek mathematician's previously unknown treatise on The Method of Mechanical Theorems. Heiberg's find made the front page of the New York Times on July 16, 1907, under the headline "Big Literary Find in Constantinople." But then, suddenly, the palimpsest went missing again (probably stolen, Netz believes), reappearing - unbeknownst to pretty much the entire world - in the 1930s in a private collection in Paris. Only when Christie's Auction House sold it to another private collector in 1998 did scholars realize the book still survived. The Times published another story: "Archimedes Text Sold for $2 million," reads the headline on Oct. 30 of that year. The buyer permitted the text to be displayed as part of an exhibition titled Eureka! The Archimedes Palimpsest at the Walters Art Museum, where it is presently being scanned and conserved. A few clarifications: The palimpsest almost certainly was first located at the Greek Orthodox Monastery of Mar Saba, between Bethlehem and the Dead Sea, in the Judean Desert. The original text of Archimedes had been copied by monks a few times, and this was the only copy that was left, probably the original was only a few copies back, so it is believed to be very accurate. But the monk who went out of writing material had no knowledge of the importance of the piece, so he cut up the copy, scraped away the ink so it was almost invisible and refolded the pages so that each original page made up four smaller pages, with the almost unreadable original text perpendicular to the new text, which he wrote over it. That's when it became a palimpsest. This palimpsest later ended up in a library in Constantinopel. It was a lucky chance that made Heiberg, who knew Greek and understood the significance of the piece, discover it. But he was not allowed to borrow the book, so he photographed the pages for a later partial reconstruction of the text. However, he also must have ripped out and stole one of the pages, as it later reappeared in Cambridge. This was a lucky chance, as that's where the text was rediscovered after believed to be lost. The palimpsest was sold to a guy in Paris after WW1 as a "souvernir" together with a lot of stuff taken from Constantinopel, where it was recently tracked down by a guy working at Christie's. In an incredibly poor state, this text has only been possible to reconstruct with modern technology and expertise from several people. Some small parts of it is already beyond salvage I think, because mould has eaten through the pages. The text is unique, because no other text describes not only his theorems, but how he worked them out. It's a unique look into the mind of a legendary genious. |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 11:57am | |
| Deleted User | Now on to some of your comments: As you can see, the Christians didn't deliberately destroy the works of the ancient Greeks in this case. They actually preserved them, by making copies. It was just bad luck that this particular text was subject to this treatment. However, who knows if it had survived in its original state. Maybe the reshaping into a religious text actually saved it through history. We can only speculate about that... About the comments on lost knowledge: Mathematics wasn't developed much during the dark ages. But the old Greek texts were studied in detail, and people learned from them. If this text had been available to these people, there is no doubt that they had understood the reasoning of Archimedes, and hence came to understand the ideas about measuring curves. These concepts are not hard to understand, but to discover in the first place. It took a genious like Archimedes, or later Newton and Leibniz, to trigger the idea and thereby passing a milestone in science. This milestone was reached, but then the knowledge was lost and humanity had to start over from the last one. Of course, it cannot be predicted how the world would have developed if scientific progress had come in earlier ages, as science, religion and culture are all linked together in real life, but the world would probably have looked a lot different. An interesting thing discovered in the palimpsest is that to Archimedes and other ancient Greeks, drawings were considered as important as text in mathematical proofs. Heiberg could never see his drawings properly, because of the way the book was bound. Only by detaching the pages, hence revealing stuff that were hidden in the bindings of the pages, they could get the full picture that Heiberg never got from his photos. Not to mention that the entire text isn't legible from a regular photo. Only by scanning the pages with different lights and processing the images in a computer could everything be revealed. About religion: It's very dangerous to accuse religions themselves for bad things people have made. Just because Christians have done a lot of horrible things through history in the name of God, as have followers of other religions, doesn't mean the religion itself is to blame. I'm an agnostic too btw, but not because of this. However, I believe it's in everyone's interest that religion takes no part in either science or politics. That's bad news waiting to happen... |
| 2 MAR 2003 at 3:45pm | |
MichalNGrand Inquisitor![]() ![]() Posts : 7058 Joined: 14 SEP 2003 Status : Online | Originally Posted By narji (2 MAR 2003 5:24am) OK, some may call me elitist again, but there's a simple explanation for this narji: the people posting here whose native language isn't English have almost all college education or are students. They hardly represent the average of their respective populations. In other words, you won't get to talk to the less educated people from their countries because they won't speak English! It says a lot for your upbringing and schooling and not b**** much for ours. I have a Portuguese sister-in-law who speaks about 5 languages - makes me quite ashamed of our school system in Australia and New Zealand. Woops, now I'm totally off the "off-topic" topic. It's a question of needs. Most English speaking people don't need to learn another language. People whose native language is Dutch or Greek or Swedish or Norwegian or Czech or who knows what pretty much have to. It's not necessarily that they want to learn foreign languages, but there's no way to avoid it... so don't feel too bad about it I forgot my sig. |
| Profile Search | |
| 3 MAR 2003 at 7:34am | |
JoGuild Master![]() ![]() Posts : 3313 Joined: 3 NOV 2002 Location: AU, Qld. Status : Offline | Michal I don't actually think your remarks are elitist at all, but it's a fact of life that people in Europe - whether or not they have had a university education - generally seem to speak English to some extent or other and I just believe that there should be more emphasis put on other countries languages over here. Both our kids took either French or German at school and my husband and I both took French also. It's certainly not compulsory and we are finding that teenagers are leaving school without even being able to spell properly and often not even read properly. I would be very interested to know if the USA and other countries have similar problems. There I go again - off the "off topic" subject that this post is all about. Sorry. |
| Profile Search | |
| Page 1 |
Back to Top | Home | News | Articles | Forum | About Us | Contact Us
Copyright ©2013, Just Adventure LLC. All rights reserved in the United States and throughout the world.
All other products and copyrights mentioned on
Just Adventure LLC are the property of their respective companies, and Just Adventure LLC makes no claim thereto.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy







