If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the
FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to
register or
login before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
| 4 OCT 2006 at 9:24pm |
MarkGuild Master
Posts : 3803
Joined: 10 OCT 2002
Location: US, Georgia
Status : Offline | 3,030,532 bytes. Or 2,960 kilobytes. Or a whopping 2.89 megabytes (and that's not counting the 46 "love" smilies at 304 bytes each, adding another 14 kilobytes).
Ms. Gale is really pretty (and thanks), but a 2.90 megabyte post?
Don't you realize it bogs down the board for people unless they are on a T-1 line? Apparently you are linking to these huge pictures from work because I doubt you have a T-1 line at home. My little server space for me to upload pictures to so that I can provide links to them is only 10 megabytes.
Could you download these pictures, put them on your hard drive, upload them to your server space and then link to them from there?
I didn't think so. This one post of yours alone would take up approximately one-third of my server space (that I pay for).
Only on occasion do I link to a picture that I haven't downloaded, resized, and then uploaded for others to view. Bandwidth is expensive and linking to pictures on other people's websites can put a strain on their servers, slowing down their websites - and possibly causing them to crash.
Even with internet service via a DSL or cable modem - it's too much. And I shudder to think of those people on dial-up trying to view this post.
Why do you always insist on going over the top with stuff, ShadowWalker? If you post one link, you post twenty. If you post one large picture, you post thirteen. You drive your points home so hard it's difficult to read or look at all of them. It is unbearably overwhelming.
Please proofread your posts carefully to see if you any words out.
|
| 4 OCT 2006 at 9:25pm |
BazzaLBPrivate Detective
Posts : 512
Joined: 27 AUG 2005
Location: AU
Status : Offline | Originally Posted By Mark (4 OCT 2006 9:20pm)
3,030,532 bytes. Or 2,960 kilobytes. Or a whopping 2.89 megabytes (and that's not counting the 46 "love" smilies at 304 bytes each, adding another 14 kilobytes).
Ms. Gale is really pretty (and thanks), but a 2.90 megabyte post?
Don't you realize it bogs down the board unless they are on a T-1 line?
Even with internet service via a DSL or cable modem - it's too much. And I shudder to think of those people on dial-up trying to view this post.
Why do you always insist on going over the top with stuff, ShadowWalker? If you post one link, you post twenty. If you post one large picture, you post ten. You drive your points home so hard it's difficult to read or look at all of them. It is unbearably overwhelming.
I find it a little bit "sad".
|
| 4 OCT 2006 at 9:53pm |
ValGuild Master
Posts : 3464
Joined: 2 OCT 2002
Location: US
Status : Offline | Shadowalker, please use links to pictures when they are going to be that big and that many. Please edit your post with these pics and make them links instead.
Thank you!
Val
Edit: I edited your post and made them links for you.
We can be heroes, just for one day.
|
| 4 OCT 2006 at 10:12pm |
Alan ThornSorcerer Apprentice
Posts : 240
Joined: 8 JUN 2005
Status : Online | Originally Posted By Mark (4 OCT 2006 9:24pm)
3,030,532 bytes. Or 2,960 kilobytes. Or a whopping 2.89 megabytes (and that's not counting the 46 "love" smilies at 304 bytes each, adding another 14 kilobytes).
I didn't think so. This one post of yours alone would take up approximately one-third of my server space (that I pay for).
Do you have a website, Mark? If so, I'd like to view it. I'm just curious :-)
|
| 4 OCT 2006 at 10:17pm |
MarkGuild Master
Posts : 3803
Joined: 10 OCT 2002
Location: US, Georgia
Status : Offline | Originally Posted By Alan Thorn (4 OCT 2006 10:12pm)
Do you have a website, Mark? If so, I'd like to view it. I'm just curious
No, sorry, I don't. I just have the ten megabytes of server space my internet service provider gives me that I use for incidental purposes.
Hm. Maybe I should.
Please proofread your posts carefully to see if you any words out.
|
| 5 OCT 2006 at 4:14am |
| Deleted User | Originally Posted By Mark (4 OCT 2006 10:17pm)
Originally Posted By Alan Thorn (4 OCT 2006 10:12pm)
Do you have a website, Mark? If so, I'd like to view it. I'm just curious
No, sorry, I don't. I just have the ten megabytes of server space my internet service provider gives me that I use for incidental purposes.
Hm. Maybe I should.
Yes you should. I want to see the images of early Mark debauchery while touring.
|
| 5 OCT 2006 at 4:57pm |
anthonyJourneyman
Posts : 1270
Joined: 11 JUN 2003
Status : Offline | Well, Ms. Gale may not be emaciated but she still looks pretty thin to me. It wasn't always this way. There was a time when the female models looked a bit healthier:
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v59/adisarro/amedeomodigliani.jpg[/img]
|
| 5 OCT 2006 at 7:45pm |
ShadowWalkerJourneyman
Posts : 997
Joined: 27 JUL 2005
Status : Offline | Originally Posted By Mark (4 OCT 2006 9:24pm)
3,030,532 bytes. Or 2,960 kilobytes. Or a whopping 2.89 megabytes (and that's not counting the 46 "love" smilies at 304 bytes each, adding another 14 kilobytes).
Ms. Gale is really pretty (and thanks), but a 2.90 megabyte post?
Don't you realize it bogs down the board for people unless they are on a T-1 line? Apparently you are linking to these huge pictures from work because I doubt you have a T-1 line at home. My little server space for me to upload pictures to so that I can provide links to them is only 10 megabytes.
Could you download these pictures, put them on your hard drive, upload them to your server space and then link to them from there?
I didn't think so. This one post of yours alone would take up approximately one-third of my server space (that I pay for).
Only on occasion do I link to a picture that I haven't downloaded, resized, and then uploaded for others to view. Bandwidth is expensive and linking to pictures on other people's websites can put a strain on their servers, slowing down their websites - and possibly causing them to crash.
Even with internet service via a DSL or cable modem - it's too much. And I shudder to think of those people on dial-up trying to view this post.
Why do you always insist on going over the top with stuff, ShadowWalker? If you post one link, you post twenty. If you post one large picture, you post thirteen. You drive your points home so hard it's difficult to read or look at all of them. It is unbearably overwhelming.
Hello There!
Okay! Mark...keep your hair curlers on! Geez!
No appreciation for bandwith highjacking!
Satisfied! Oh...whiners! on't you just want to .........
|
